netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] cxgb4: Allow for backward compatibility with new VPD scheme.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130308.124411.445253877641244372.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:44:11 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vipul@...lsio.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, divy@...lsio.com, dm@...lsio.com,
	abhishek@...lsio.com, santosh@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] cxgb4: Allow for backward compatibility with
 new VPD scheme.

From: Vipul Pandya <vipul@...lsio.com>
Date: Fri,  8 Mar 2013 19:05:29 +0530

> From: Santosh Rastapur <santosh@...lsio.com>
> 
> New scheme calls for 3rd party VPD at offset 0x0 and Chelsio VPD at offset
> 0x400 of the function.  If no 3rd party VPD is present, then a copy of
> Chelsio's VPD will be at offset 0x0 to keep in line with PCI spec which
> requires the VPD to be present at offset 0x0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Rastapur <santosh@...lsio.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vipul Pandya <vipul@...lsio.com>

Isn't this a fix which is better targetted at 'net' than 'net-next'?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html