| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:09:10 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost_net: remove tx polling state
On 03/11/2013 12:50 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:31:56PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> After commit 2b8b328b61c799957a456a5a8dab8cc7dea68575 (vhost_net: handle polling
>> errors when setting backend), we in fact track the polling state through
>> poll->wqh, so there's no need to duplicate the work with an extra
>> vhost_net_polling_state. So this patch removes this and make the code simpler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> I'd prefer a more radical approach, since I think it can be even
> simpler: tap and macvtap backends both only send events when tx queue
> overruns which should almost never happen.
>
> So let's just start polling when VQ is enabled
> drop all poll_start/stop calls on data path.
I think then it may damage the performance at least for tx. We
conditionally enable the tx polling in the past to reduce the
unnecessary wakeups of vhost thead when zerocopy or sndbuf is used. If
we don't stop the polling, after each packet were transmitted,
tap/macvtap will try to wakeup the vhost thread.
Actually, I'm considering the reverse direction. Looks like we can
disable the rx polling like what we do for tx in handle_tx() to reduce
the uncessary wakeups.
> The optimization was written for packet socket backend but I know of no
> one caring about performance of that one that much.
> Needs a bit of perf testing to make sure I didn't miss anything though
> but it's not 3.9 material anyway so there's no rush.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/vhost/net.c | 60 ++++++++----------------------------------------
>> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 3 ++
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> index 959b1cd..d1a03dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> @@ -64,20 +64,10 @@ enum {
>> VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX = 2,
>> };
>>
>> -enum vhost_net_poll_state {
>> - VHOST_NET_POLL_DISABLED = 0,
>> - VHOST_NET_POLL_STARTED = 1,
>> - VHOST_NET_POLL_STOPPED = 2,
>> -};
>> -
>> struct vhost_net {
>> struct vhost_dev dev;
>> struct vhost_virtqueue vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX];
>> struct vhost_poll poll[VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX];
>> - /* Tells us whether we are polling a socket for TX.
>> - * We only do this when socket buffer fills up.
>> - * Protected by tx vq lock. */
>> - enum vhost_net_poll_state tx_poll_state;
>> /* Number of TX recently submitted.
>> * Protected by tx vq lock. */
>> unsigned tx_packets;
>> @@ -155,28 +145,6 @@ static void copy_iovec_hdr(const struct iovec *from, struct iovec *to,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -/* Caller must have TX VQ lock */
>> -static void tx_poll_stop(struct vhost_net *net)
>> -{
>> - if (likely(net->tx_poll_state != VHOST_NET_POLL_STARTED))
>> - return;
>> - vhost_poll_stop(net->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX);
>> - net->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_STOPPED;
>> -}
>> -
>> -/* Caller must have TX VQ lock */
>> -static int tx_poll_start(struct vhost_net *net, struct socket *sock)
>> -{
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - if (unlikely(net->tx_poll_state != VHOST_NET_POLL_STOPPED))
>> - return 0;
>> - ret = vhost_poll_start(net->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX, sock->file);
>> - if (!ret)
>> - net->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_STARTED;
>> - return ret;
>> -}
>> -
>> /* In case of DMA done not in order in lower device driver for some reason.
>> * upend_idx is used to track end of used idx, done_idx is used to track head
>> * of used idx. Once lower device DMA done contiguously, we will signal KVM
>> @@ -231,6 +199,7 @@ static void vhost_zerocopy_callback(struct ubuf_info *ubuf, bool success)
>> static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>> {
>> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &net->dev.vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
>> + struct vhost_poll *poll = net->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX;
>> unsigned out, in, s;
>> int head;
>> struct msghdr msg = {
>> @@ -256,7 +225,7 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>> wmem = atomic_read(&sock->sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
>> if (wmem >= sock->sk->sk_sndbuf) {
>> mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
>> - tx_poll_start(net, sock);
>> + vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file);
>> mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
>> return;
>> }
>> @@ -265,7 +234,7 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>> vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
>>
>> if (wmem < sock->sk->sk_sndbuf / 2)
>> - tx_poll_stop(net);
>> + vhost_poll_stop(poll);
>> hdr_size = vq->vhost_hlen;
>> zcopy = vq->ubufs;
>>
>> @@ -287,7 +256,7 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>
>> wmem = atomic_read(&sock->sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
>> if (wmem >= sock->sk->sk_sndbuf * 3 / 4) {
>> - tx_poll_start(net, sock);
>> + vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file);
>> set_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &sock->flags);
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -298,7 +267,7 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>> (vq->upend_idx - vq->done_idx) :
>> (vq->upend_idx + UIO_MAXIOV - vq->done_idx);
>> if (unlikely(num_pends > VHOST_MAX_PEND)) {
>> - tx_poll_start(net, sock);
>> + vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file);
>> set_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &sock->flags);
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -364,7 +333,7 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>> }
>> vhost_discard_vq_desc(vq, 1);
>> if (err == -EAGAIN || err == -ENOBUFS)
>> - tx_poll_start(net, sock);
>> + vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file);
>> break;
>> }
>> if (err != len)
>> @@ -627,7 +596,6 @@ static int vhost_net_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>>
>> vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX, handle_tx_net, POLLOUT, dev);
>> vhost_poll_init(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX, handle_rx_net, POLLIN, dev);
>> - n->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_DISABLED;
>>
>> f->private_data = n;
>>
>> @@ -637,32 +605,24 @@ static int vhost_net_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
>> static void vhost_net_disable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
>> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> {
>> + struct vhost_poll *poll = n->poll + (vq - n->vqs);
>> if (!vq->private_data)
>> return;
>> - if (vq == n->vqs + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX) {
>> - tx_poll_stop(n);
>> - n->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_DISABLED;
>> - } else
>> - vhost_poll_stop(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
>> + vhost_poll_stop(poll);
>> }
>>
>> static int vhost_net_enable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
>> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
>> {
>> + struct vhost_poll *poll = n->poll + (vq - n->vqs);
>> struct socket *sock;
>> - int ret;
>>
>> sock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
>> lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
>> if (!sock)
>> return 0;
>> - if (vq == n->vqs + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX) {
>> - n->tx_poll_state = VHOST_NET_POLL_STOPPED;
>> - ret = tx_poll_start(n, sock);
>> - } else
>> - ret = vhost_poll_start(n->poll + VHOST_NET_VQ_RX, sock->file);
>>
>> - return ret;
>> + return vhost_poll_start(poll, sock->file);
>> }
>>
>> static struct socket *vhost_net_stop_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> index 9759249..4eecdb8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ int vhost_poll_start(struct vhost_poll *poll, struct file *file)
>> unsigned long mask;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> + if (poll->wqh)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> mask = file->f_op->poll(file, &poll->table);
>> if (mask)
>> vhost_poll_wakeup(&poll->wait, 0, 0, (void *)mask);
>> --
>> 1.7.1
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists