netdev - Re: [PATCH] Rate should be u64 to avoid integer overflow at high speeds (>= ~35Gbit)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <513F5020.7090408@genband.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:56:16 -0600
From:	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>, Vimal <j.vimal@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rate should be u64 to avoid integer overflow at high
 speeds (>= ~35Gbit)

On 03/12/2013 09:53 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:

> I have strong opinions either way, but I don't think "imprecision" is a
> problem in practice.

Oops, make that "I don't have strong opinions...".   :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html