lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130313155743.641adada@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date:	Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:57:43 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jesse@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] GRE: Use RTNL for atomic protocol
 registration.

On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:48:27 -0700
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:

> Currently gre demultiplexer uses its own spin-lock. We should
> rather RTNL lock.
> 
> Suggested-by: Stephen Hemminger <--cc stephen@...workplumber.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>

Contradicting myself :-)
This does have added safety but some people eventually want to get rid
of the big network lock. That said, it makes sense that you would need a
supersized lock when playing with multiple devices.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ