[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130313155743.641adada@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:57:43 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jesse@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/6] GRE: Use RTNL for atomic protocol
registration.
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:48:27 -0700
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com> wrote:
> Currently gre demultiplexer uses its own spin-lock. We should
> rather RTNL lock.
>
> Suggested-by: Stephen Hemminger <--cc stephen@...workplumber.org>
> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Contradicting myself :-)
This does have added safety but some people eventually want to get rid
of the big network lock. That said, it makes sense that you would need a
supersized lock when playing with multiple devices.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists