[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrV46U80K1ZgEkW0Gzxsn7V1Qx70Ogx1RCZTuAjAGxsipg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:22:43 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LRO/GRO and libpcap packet reordering
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 00:16 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 15:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> > Right. This is the part that I'm wondering about an efficient fix to
>> > (i.e. flush GRO state for one flow whenever a packet for the reversed
>> > flow is seen).
>>
>> It doesnt seem doable easily, because network header and tcp headers are
>> handled in two separate functions in GRO stack (inet_gro_receive() &
>> tcp_gro_receive()
>>
>> What you could do is changing MAX_GRO_SKBS from 8 to 1
>> (basically allowing only one flow in GRO stack)
>>
>>
> Well, its not enough, some changes would be needed to force a flush each
> time a new flow is detected.
>
>
>
Hmm. Maybe a better "fix" would be to have some up-to-date
documentation or other indication of what needs to happen to get clean
packet captures. I'm not sure where it should go.
--Andy
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists