[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6-1L7Von88pAhHzhyaJiL8x4w9cNpJw+k+0Giu5Jh-fYJ37g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:28:28 +0100
From: Sylvain Munaut <s.munaut@...tever-company.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Who/What is supposed to remove IPv6 address from interface when
moving from one network to another ?
Hi,
>> This might be a dumb idea but, would it make sense for the kernel not
>> to use as source address, an address generated from a prefix for which
>> the route has expired ?
>
> The route doesn't expire either. (And neither does the default gateway).
Ah sorry.
In my case the router lifetime is much shorter ( a few minutes ) and
expired by the time I get home, which is why I was only faced with the
"using bad source address" issue.
In anycase, following Dan's reponse, I just flush all ipv6 on suspend
now ... (NetworkManager was a bit heavy-weight to just sort that
particular issue ...)
Cheers,
Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists