[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130318064021.GA4713@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:40:24 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...il.com>
CC: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] arm: mxs: sanitize enet_out clock handling
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:27:35PM -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
> But as you say most boards need enet_out (AFAICT, all but the Denx
> board). So wouldn't it make more sense to add enet_out to the dtsi
> file and then just override it in the one board that doesn't need it,
> instead of overriding in every board except that one?
Yes, sounds reasonable. Since I'm not sure Wolfram is still interested
in the work, I will pick it up from here.
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists