netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] xen-netfront: drop skb when skb->len

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1363618459.2963.10.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:54:19 +0000
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"annie.li@...cle.com" <annie.li@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xen-netfront: drop skb when skb->len > 65535

On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 14:40 +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:42 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 10:35 +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > The `size' field of Xen network wire format is uint16_t, anything bigger than
> > > 65535 will cause overflow.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/xen-netfront.c |   12 ++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> > > index 5527663..8c3d065 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> > > @@ -547,6 +547,18 @@ static int xennet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > >  	unsigned int len = skb_headlen(skb);
> > >  	unsigned long flags;
> > >  
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * wire format of xen_netif_tx_request only supports skb->len
> > > +	 * < 64K, because size field in xen_netif_tx_request is
> > > +	 * uint16_t.
> > 
> > Is there some field we can set e.g. in struct ethernet_device which
> > would stop this from happening?
> > 
> 
> struct ethernet_device? I could not find it.
> 
> And for struct net_device,

I meant struct net_device.

>  there is no field for this AFAICT.

Interesting. Are hardware devices expected to cope with arbitrary sized
GSO skbs then I wonder.

Ian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html