[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363619244.2963.11.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:07:24 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"annie.li@...cle.com" <annie.li@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] xen-netfront: drop skb when skb->len > 65535
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 15:04 +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 14:54 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 14:40 +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:42 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 10:35 +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > > The `size' field of Xen network wire format is uint16_t, anything bigger than
> > > > > 65535 will cause overflow.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/net/xen-netfront.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> > > > > index 5527663..8c3d065 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netfront.c
> > > > > @@ -547,6 +547,18 @@ static int xennet_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > > > > unsigned int len = skb_headlen(skb);
> > > > > unsigned long flags;
> > > > >
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * wire format of xen_netif_tx_request only supports skb->len
> > > > > + * < 64K, because size field in xen_netif_tx_request is
> > > > > + * uint16_t.
> > > >
> > > > Is there some field we can set e.g. in struct ethernet_device which
> > > > would stop this from happening?
> > > >
> > >
> > > struct ethernet_device? I could not find it.
> > >
> > > And for struct net_device,
> >
> > I meant struct net_device.
> >
> > > there is no field for this AFAICT.
> >
> > Interesting. Are hardware devices expected to cope with arbitrary sized
> > GSO skbs then I wonder.
> >
>
> No idea. But there is a macro called GSO_MAX_SIZE (65536) in struct
> net_device. :-)
But aren't we seeing skb's bigger than that?
Maybe this is just a historical bug in some older guests?
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists