netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] net: filter: BPF updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130319.105111.544492969414189008.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:51:11 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dborkman@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, jasowang@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] net: filter: BPF updates

From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:42:07 +0100

> On 03/19/2013 03:38 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:33:59 +0100
>>
>>> This set adds i) an ancillary operation to the BPF engine and ii) a
>>> BPF JIT image disassembler in order to verify or debug the BPF JIT
>>> compilers under arch/*/net/.
>>>
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>> 	- No need to reorder choke_skb_cb structure
>>
>> So we want the first patch in 'net' right?
> 
> Eric and Jason mentioned that they need to do a bug fix, where they
> could simplify code for the fix by having the 1st patch of this set
> in the net tree as well.
> 
> However, all other patches of this set except the last one also depend
> on the first one, so it would be net and net-next then. Eric, please
> correct me if I'm wrong?

That's fine, I can handle such dependencies without any problems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html