netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: Add socket() system call self test.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGRGNgU4nyDrbbN6QWh06PknACP9+h2sFrRcNyOLU_pnwMU5EA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:12:09 +1100
From:	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add socket() system call self test.

Hi David,

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:52 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> ---
>
> As mentioned during the netfilter workshop, we will be adding
> all sorts of networking tests now that 3.9.x has a selftest
> framework in place.
>
> The first test I'm adding to net-next does some very simple
> testing of the socket() system call.
>
> Feel free to send patches for more tests, making the run
> script more powerful (perhaps by taking a whitespace
> seperated list of tests to run on the command line), and
> adding more checks to the socket.c test.
>
> Thanks.
>
>  tools/testing/selftests/Makefile                   |  1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/net-socket/Makefile        | 16 ++++
>  .../testing/selftests/net-socket/run_netsocktests  | 12 +++
>  tools/testing/selftests/net-socket/socket.c        | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net-socket/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net-socket/run_netsocktests
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net-socket/socket.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> index 3cc0ad7..7c6280f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ TARGETS += vm
>  TARGETS += cpu-hotplug
>  TARGETS += memory-hotplug
>  TARGETS += efivarfs
> +TARGETS += net-socket
>
>  all:
>         for TARGET in $(TARGETS); do \
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net-socket/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net-socket/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f27ee10
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net-socket/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +# Makefile for net-socket selftests
> +
> +CC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
> +CFLAGS = -Wall
> +
> +NET_SOCK_PROGS = socket
> +
> +all: $(NET_SOCK_PROGS)
> +%: %.c
> +       $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $^
> +
> +run_tests: all
> +       @/bin/sh ./run_netsocktests || echo "vmtests: [FAIL]"

Should that not be "vmtests"?

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
.Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html