[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363675960.4767.10.camel@nexus>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:52:40 +0900
From: Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao
<fernando_b1@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: linux-man@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Hirotaka Sasaki <sasaki.hirotaka@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] man/send(2): document a long standing bug that can
cause spurious EPERM errors
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] man/send(2): document a long standing bug that can cause spurious EPERM errors
This bug has been known since early 2009 (the latest) and discussed in
netdev before:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&w=2&r=1&s=Possible+race+condition+in+conntracking+&q=b
It seems that a proper fix would be non trivial, so document the bug
in the meantime.
Reported-by: Hirotaka Sasaki <sasaki.hirotaka@....ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@....ntt.co.jp>
---
diff -urNp man-pages-3.50-orig/man2/send.2 man-pages-3.50/man2/send.2
--- man-pages-3.50-orig/man2/send.2 2013-03-19 15:18:03.784306647 +0900
+++ man-pages-3.50/man2/send.2 2013-03-19 15:30:40.788060426 +0900
@@ -420,6 +420,11 @@ Linux may return
.B EPIPE
instead of
.BR ENOTCONN .
+
+Linux may return spurious
+.B EPERM
+errors when netfilter's conntrack module is loaded and two or more
+UDP packets belonging to the same connection are processed in parallel.
.SH EXAMPLE
An example of the use of
.BR sendto ()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists