netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: reset transport header if it was not set before transmission

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <514860DC.9020404@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:58:04 +0100
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: reset transport header if it was not
 set before transmission

On 03/19/2013 01:13 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 17:26 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 03/18/2013 12:13 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 19:10:51 -0700
>>>
>>>> Any way we can avoid adding this to fast path, for people not using
>>>> macvtap and ixgbe ?
>>> Likewise I'd rather see macvtap be responsible for fixing this up by
>>> setting the transport header properly, and therfore sending well
>>> formed packets to the rest of the stack.
>>
>> Ok, haven't checked all other possibility but looks like packet needs to
>> be fixed also.
>
> Daniel, could you post your patches if ready ?

Yes, will post them in a couple of minutes.

> Jason, I believe you could reuse existing flow dissector once Daniel
> patches are in.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html