[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130319.094240.1315516663563952557.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:42:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] RxRPC: use copy_to_user() instead of memcpy()
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:55:03 +0300
> This is a user pointer. Changing the memcpy() to copy_to_user()
> fixes a hang on my system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---
> I'm not very familiar with this code, so please review this
> carefully.
It really should be a kernel pointer, not a user pointer.
For example, look at how recvfrom() cooks up a recvmsg method
call:
struct sockaddr_storage address;
...
msg.msg_name = (struct sockaddr *)&address;
msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(address);
...
err = sock_recvmsg(sock, &msg, size, flags);
recvmsg() proper works similarly, copying the user msghdr into a
kernel space copy via verify_iovec() or verify_compat_iovec() (and
I can understand how it's not obvious that this is the function
that performs this operation).
> /* copy the peer address and timestamp */
> if (!continue_call) {
> - if (msg->msg_name && msg->msg_namelen > 0)
> - memcpy(msg->msg_name,
> - &call->conn->trans->peer->srx,
> - sizeof(call->conn->trans->peer->srx));
I bet the size is too large for a sockaddr_storage, and therefore we
spam the kernel stack. So I can only guess that changing this to a
copy_to_user() fixes the hang because it simply faults on the kernel
destination address.
->srx should be a "struct sockaddr_rxrpc" but that doesn't appear to
exceed the 128-byte size of sockaddr_storage.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists