[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363702840.3232.104.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:20:40 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: hannes@...essinduktion.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] inet: limit length of fragment queue hash table
bucket lists
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:03 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:32:30 +0100
>
> > This patch introduces a constant limit of the fragment queue hash
> > table bucket list lengths. Currently the limit 128 is choosen somewhat
> > arbitrary and just ensures that we can fill up the fragment cache with
> > empty packets up to the default ip_frag_high_thresh limits. It should
> > just protect from list iteration eating considerable amounts of cpu.
> >
> > If we reach the maximum length in one hash bucket a warning is printed.
> > This is implemented on the caller side of inet_frag_find to distinguish
> > between the different users of inet_fragment.c.
> >
> > I dropped the out of memory warning in the ipv4 fragment lookup path,
> > because we already get a warning by the slab allocator.
> >
> > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
>
> This looks mostly fine to me, Eric could you give it a quick review?
>
> Although one comment from me:
>
> > +/* averaged:
> > + * max_depth = default ipfrag_high_thresh / INETFRAGS_HASHSZ /
> > + * rounded up (SKB_TRUELEN(0) + sizeof(struct ipq or
> > + * struct frag_queue))
> > + */
> > +#define INETFRAGS_MAXDEPTH 128
>
> If we deem this to be the ideal formula, maybe we can maintain it
> accurately and very cheaply at run time. We'd do this by adding a
> handler for the ipfrag_high_thresh sysctl, and use that to recalculate
> the maxdepth any time ipfrag_high_thresh is changed by the user.
I think it's overkill to implement this now. I just want this patch in
as a safeguard.
The idea I discussed with Eric, will remove the need for this patch.
The idea is to drop the LRU lists, increase the hash size a bit, and do
cleanup/eviction directly on the frag hash tables. And e.g. only allow
5 frag queue elements in each hash bucket... but more work and testing
is needed before I have something ready.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists