[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130320160418.GG20530@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:04:18 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@...escale.com>
Cc: lznuaa@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1 net-next] NET: FEC: dynamtic check DMA desc buff
type
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 10:04:23AM +0800, Frank Li wrote:
> MX6 and mx28 support enhanced DMA descriptor buff to support 1588
> ptp. But MX25, MX3x, MX5x can't support enhanced DMA descriptor buff.
> Check fec type and choose correct DMA descriptor buff type.
>
> Remove static config CONFIG_FEC_PTP.
> ptp function will be auto detected.
Your patch (now as ff43da86c69d76a726ffe7d1666148960dc1d108 in v3.9-rc1)
breaks building with CONFIG_FEC=m:
ERROR: "fec_ptp_init" [drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "fec_ptp_ioctl" [drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "fec_ptp_start_cyclecounter" [drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec.ko] undefined!
IMHO you should build fec.o and fec_ptp.o into the same module as they
cannot live without each other anyhow.
Having said I wonder if it would be worthwile to support FEC without
PTP_1588_CLOCK. For example make the above three functions static
inlines if CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK=n and drop the select on the latter.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists