[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1363891025.17509.1.camel@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:37:05 +0000
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
CC: <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"annie.li@...cle.com" <annie.li@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xen-netback: coalesce slots before copying
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 12:07 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > /* Skip first skb fragment if it is on same page as header fragment. */
> > start = (frag_get_pending_idx(&shinfo->frags[0]) == pending_idx);
> >
> > - for (i = start; i < shinfo->nr_frags; i++, txp++) {
> > - struct page *page;
> > - pending_ring_idx_t index;
> > + /* Coalesce tx requests, at this point the packet passed in
> > + * should be <= 64K. Any packets larger than 64K has been
> > + * dropped / caused fatal error early on.
>
> Whereabouts is this? Since the size field is u16 how do we even detect
> this case. Since (at least prior to your other fix in this series) it
> would have overflowed when the guest constructed the request.
>
This is done in netbk_count_requests(). I will fix the comment here.
>
> > @@ -1025,6 +1108,7 @@ static int xen_netbk_tx_check_gop(struct xen_netbk *netbk,
> > struct gnttab_copy *gop = *gopp;
> > u16 pending_idx = *((u16 *)skb->data);
> > struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
> > + struct pending_tx_info *tx_info;
> > int nr_frags = shinfo->nr_frags;
> > int i, err, start;
> >
> > @@ -1037,12 +1121,17 @@ static int xen_netbk_tx_check_gop(struct xen_netbk *netbk,
> > start = (frag_get_pending_idx(&shinfo->frags[0]) == pending_idx);
> >
> > for (i = start; i < nr_frags; i++) {
> > - int j, newerr;
> > + int j, newerr = 0, n;
> >
> > pending_idx = frag_get_pending_idx(&shinfo->frags[i]);
> > + tx_info = &netbk->pending_tx_info[pending_idx];
> >
> > /* Check error status: if okay then remember grant handle. */
> > - newerr = (++gop)->status;
> > + for (n = 0; n < tx_info->nr_tx_req; n++) {
> struct pending_tx_info is used in some arrays which can have a fair few
> elements so if there are ways to reduce the size that is worth
> considering I think.
>
> So rather than storing both nr_tx_req and start_idx can we just store
> start_idx and loop while start_idx != 0 (where the first one has
> start_idx == zero)?
>
> This might fall out more naturally if you were to instead store next_idx
> in each pending tx with a suitable terminator at the end? Or could be
> last_idx if it is convenient to count that way round, you don't need to
> respond in-order.
>
Done shrinking this structure.
Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists