netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] gro: relax ID check in inet_gro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130321.162017.605403865098695084.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:20:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	maze@...gle.com
Cc:	dkravkov@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	dmitry@...adcom.com, eilong@...adcom.com, pshelar@...ira.com,
	hkchu@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] gro: relax ID check in inet_gro_receive()

From: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:14:44 -0700

> Reverting/deleting this code is going way too far.
> Mark it experimental, but don't delete it.

I disagree, people who want to play can apply the code
to their tree.

It's as simple as that.

We have very reasonable requirements for segmentation offloads, if
they are not met, the feature isn't working correctly and therefore
isn't ready for upstream.

Now if someone can provide a fix soon, that's fine too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html