[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130321.170511.612698812448620739.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:05:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: maze@...gle.com
Cc: dkravkov@...il.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dmitry@...adcom.com, eilong@...adcom.com, pshelar@...ira.com,
hkchu@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] gro: relax ID check in inet_gro_receive()
From: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:47:07 -0700
> They might create non incrementing IP ID packet sequences on the wire,
> and this may prevent GRO from kicking in, but it does not make TSO
> non-reversible
> (if anything it makes it easy to detect that it happened).
This is not an acceptable outcome for any form GSO, it should be
completely transparent. The packets we would have output individually
and those which result from the segmented frame must be
indistinguishable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists