[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130321125230.GB9046@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:52:30 +0000
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] netlink: Diag core and basic socket info dumping
On 03/21/13 at 01:21pm, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netlink_diag.h b/include/uapi/linux/netlink_diag.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9328866
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netlink_diag.h
> +enum {
> + NETLINK_DIAG_MEMINFO,
> + NETLINK_DIAG_GROUPS,
> +
> + NETLINK_DIAG_MAX,
> +};
Please follow the common pattern and define NETLINK_DIAG_MAX as
NETLINK_DIAG_GROUPS like other by doing>
[...]
__NETLINK_DIAG_MAX,
};
#define NETLINK_DIAG_MAX (__NETLINK_DIAG_MAX - 1)
Everyone is used to do:
struct nlattr *attrs[NETLINK_DIAG_MAX+1];
nla_parse([...], NETLINK_DIAG_MAX, [...]
In fact, the follow-up patch to ss is buggy because of this.
UNIX_DIAG_MAX suffers from the same problem which is problem the
cause for this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists