netdev - Re: [patch net-next v5 10/11] tbf: take into account gso skbs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130322100205.GA1593@minipsycho.orion>
Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:02:05 +0100
From:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	jhs@...atatu.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, j.vimal@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v5 10/11] tbf: take into account gso skbs

Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 04:23:38PM CET, jiri@...nulli.us wrote:
>Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:01:27PM CET, eric.dumazet@...il.com wrote:
>>On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 17:46 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>>> About the gso_segment, do you see any cons doing that on enqueue path
>>> rather than dequeue?
>>> 
>>
>>It would be fine, and could be done in core stack instead of qdisc.
>>
>
>So you mean for example in tcp code? the maximum possible size would be
>propagated from set qdiscs up to the tcp code?
>
>I'm not sure how exactly do that.
>
>>netif_skb_features() for example has the following (incomplete) check
>>
>>if (skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs > skb->dev->gso_max_segs)
>>    features &= ~NETIF_F_GSO_MASK;
>
>Why this is incomplete?
>
>>
>>We do have a dev->gso_max_size, but its currently used in TCP stack to
>>size the skbs built in tcp_sendmsg().
>
>Where exactly in tcp_sendmsg() this is? I found dev->gso_max_size is copied to
>sk_gso_max_size in tcp_v4_connect->sk_setup_caps.
>
>>
>>In a forwarding workload, it seems we dont use/check gso_max_size.
>
>Yep, that would require to do the segmentation in enqueue anyway. Maybe
>I can implement segmentation in enqueue path first and provide tcp
>optimalization after that. What do you think?


Reminding myself with this...

Thanks.

Jiri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html