netdev - Re: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8121/AR8113/AR8114 Gigabit or Fast Ethernet (rev b0) 1.0.0.7 md5/sha1 corrupted using NFS and samba (updated) Version 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130323021008.GC939@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date:	Sat, 23 Mar 2013 03:10:08 +0100
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	rebelyouth <rebelyouth.hacklab@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8121/AR8113/AR8114 Gigabit or Fast Ethernet (rev b0) 1.0.0.7 md5/sha1 corrupted using NFS and samba (updated) Version 2

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 08:07:22PM -0400, rebelyouth wrote:
> On 22/03/13 07:54 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 19:07 -0400, rebelyouth wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I'm writing again for the same issue about :
> >>
> >Your mail is so long that we are lost.
> >
> >Have you done some research to tell if the bug is :
> >
> >1) Sending corrupt frames
> >
> >2) receive corrupt frames
> >
> >
> Hi Eric and Hannes,
> 
> The server receiver errors  when I use the atheros:
> 
> RX packets:78125369 errors:58741 dropped:0 overruns:58741 frame:0
> 
> but on the client side  there aren't any error but the file  is corrupted
> 
> I rebooted  the server and did the test with the Realtek:
> 
>  file ok , no errors in both sides
> 
> I also reset again the server and did a test on windows using samba and 
> the Atheros:
> 
>  file ok , no errors in both sides

Could you try this patch? It solves the problem with an atl1e nic on my
friends computer. This does not solve the real problem, which I have
not yet understood (wrong packets will be discarded now and will be
hopefully resend).

[PATCH RFC] atl1e: don't rely on hardware checksumming

Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c
index e1f1b2a..0363e5b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c
@@ -1337,6 +1337,8 @@ static inline void atl1e_rx_checksum(struct atl1e_adapter *adapter,
 	u16 err_flags;
 
 	skb_checksum_none_assert(skb);
+	goto hw_xsum;
+
 	pkt_flags = prrs->pkt_flag;
 	err_flags = prrs->err_flag;
 	if (((pkt_flags & RRS_IS_IPV4) || (pkt_flags & RRS_IS_IPV6)) &&
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html