[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364312644.1716.33.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:44:04 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@...escale.com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: fec: TX Buffer incorrectly initialized
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 15:25 +0000, Jim Baxter wrote:
> The TX Buffer in fec_enet_alloc_buffers was being initialized
> with the receive register define BD_ENET_RX_INT instead of
> the transmit register define BD_ENET_TX_INT
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> index 3eb608f..2b78a1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> @@ -1391,7 +1391,7 @@ static int fec_enet_alloc_buffers(struct net_device *ndev)
>
> if (fep->bufdesc_ex) {
> struct bufdesc_ex *ebdp = (struct bufdesc_ex *)bdp;
> - ebdp->cbd_esc = BD_ENET_RX_INT;
> + ebdp->cbd_esc = BD_ENET_TX_INT;
> }
>
> bdp = fec_enet_get_nextdesc(bdp, fep->bufdesc_ex);
I am curious. What is the point having cbd_esc ?
Its a written only field.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists