netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: use the frag lru_lock to protect netns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130327.131011.171896328243899567.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:10:11 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	brouer@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, fw@...len.de,
	dborkman@...hat.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/3] net: use the frag lru_lock to protect
 netns_frags.nqueues update

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:21:48 -0700

> On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 16:55 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> Move the protection of netns_frags.nqueues updates under the LRU_lock,
>> instead of the write lock.  As they are located on the same cacheline,
>> and this is also needed when transitioning to use per hash bucket locking.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
>> ---
> 
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html