[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130327151210.GA23223@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:12:10 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Wilco Baan Hofman <wilco@...nhofman.nl>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /128 link-local subnet on 6in4 (sit) tunnels?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:04:17PM +0100, Wilco Baan Hofman wrote:
> I was trying to get OSPFv3 working on NBMA 6in4 tunnel on linux 3.8, but
> it does not work. I noticed it uses a /128 fe80 link-local subnet
> instead of the rfc4213[1]-mandated /64.. This breaks bird (likely for
> other reasons), but also interoperability with cisco, which mandates
> OSPFv3 NBMA on link-local addresses.
>
> So I was wondering, is there any particular reason for the use of a /128
> link-local or is this just a bug?
Can you show me the commands how you set up the tunnel. It does create /64 ll
with embedded ipv4 addresses for me here on v3.8.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists