[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364475933.15753.36.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 06:05:33 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: roy.qing.li@...il.com, Shan Wei <davidshan@...cent.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] core: fix the use of this_cpu_ptr
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 17:42 +0800, roy.qing.li@...il.com wrote:
> From: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
>
> flush_tasklet is not percpu var, and percpu is percpu var, and
> this_cpu_ptr(&info->cache->percpu->flush_tasklet)
> is not equal to
> &this_cpu_ptr(info->cache->percpu)->flush_tasklet
>
> 1f743b076(use this_cpu_ptr per-cpu helper) introduced this bug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <roy.qing.li@...il.com>
> ---
> net/core/flow.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/flow.c b/net/core/flow.c
> index 7fae135..e8084b8 100644
> --- a/net/core/flow.c
> +++ b/net/core/flow.c
> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static void flow_cache_flush_per_cpu(void *data)
> struct flow_flush_info *info = data;
> struct tasklet_struct *tasklet;
>
> - tasklet = this_cpu_ptr(&info->cache->percpu->flush_tasklet);
> + tasklet = &this_cpu_ptr(info->cache->percpu)->flush_tasklet;
> tasklet->data = (unsigned long)info;
> tasklet_schedule(tasklet);
> }
Hi
Any reason you dont Cc Shan Wei & Christoph Lameter ?
Christoph, could this kind of error be detected by the compiler or
sparse ?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists