[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364496577.15753.51.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:49:37 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Balakumaran Kannan <kumaran.4353@...il.com>,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, jmorris@...ei.org,
Balakumaran.Kannan@...sony.com, maruthi.thotad@...sony.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jamshed.a@...sony.com,
amit.agarwal@...sony.com, takuzo.ohara@...sony.com,
aaditya.kumar@...sony.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net IPv6 : Fix broken IPv6 routing table after
loopback down-up
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 11:23 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Agreed, there is no point in using RCU when it is not needed.
>
> That said...
>
> Since v3.1, in CONFIG_PREEMPT=y kernels, rcu_read_lock() does not
> disable preemption. In CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernels, rcu_read_lock() does
> disable preemption, but to no effect because preemption is already
> disabled anyway.
>
> The net effect is that rcu_read_lock() has no effect on preemption.
>
Good point, but this patch might be a stable candidate.
Rule of thumb for networking is
1) Control path : RTNL mutex
2) Data path : RTNL cant be taken (from softirq), so use RCU if
possible.
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists