[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130329.152606.1390301950426444505.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:26:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: shmulik.ladkani@...il.com, greearb@...delatech.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, rgohita@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: core: Remove redundant call to 'nf_reset' in
'dev_forward_skb'
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:17:36 -0700
> On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 15:11 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
>> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:13:26 +0200
>>
>> > 'nf_reset' is called just prior calling 'netif_rx'.
>> > No need to call it twice.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Igor Michailov <rgohita@...il.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
>>
>> I do not see this happening in the:
>>
>> macvlan_start_xmit()
>>
>> --> macvlan_queue_xmit()
>>
>> code path.
>>
>> I'm not applying this patch. There seems to be no real agreement
>> that the caller of dev_forward_skb() takes care of the nf_reset().
>>
>> And wouldn't it be better to consolidate the nf_reset() calls
>> into one place instead of several, increasing the audit burdon.
>>
>
> Hmm, I believe you misread this patch :
>
> nf_reset() is called _twice_ in dev_forward_skb()
Aha, that makes more sense, applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists