netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] include/linux: printk is needed in filter.h when CONFIG_BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130329.233220.2002219172165994260.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 29 Mar 2013 23:32:20 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	gang.chen@...anux.com
Cc:	edumazet@...gle.com, dborkman@...hat.com, wad@...omium.org,
	eparis@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] include/linux: printk is needed in filter.h when
 CONFIG_BPF_JIT is defined

From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:10:55 +0800

> On 2013年03月30日 03:34, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:24:53 +0800
>> 
>>> > 
>>> >   for make V=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W ARCH=arm allmodconfig
>>> >     printk is need when CONFIG_BPF_JIT is defined
>>> >     or it will report pr_err and print_hex_dump are implicit declaration
>>> > 
>>> > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
>> There are no references to pr_err nor print_hex_dump in this
>> filter.h header file.
> 
>   maybe we see the different tree.
>   I find it in next-20130328.

When you submit patches, always mention explicitly what tree you
want the patch applied to.

In this case, this appropriate tree to be "net-next" since that
is the tree where the problem actually exists.

Patch applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html