[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <515A097E.60600@candelatech.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 15:26:06 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net-sysfs: make flags symmetrical
On 04/01/2013 03:04 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:16:43 -0700
> Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com> wrote:
>
>> On 04/01/2013 11:53 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> The flags reported by sysfs are the raw kernel flags, not the version
>>> exported to user space. This leads to the unsymmetrical behaviour that
>>> read != write. An example of this is when a device is part of a
>>> bridge. The PROMISC flag returned from sysfs will not be the same as
>>> other API's.
>>>
>>> The reason this patch deserves wider discussion is someone might be
>>> depending on sysfs to read raw kernel flags.
>>
>> I am depending on this feature. There is no other way I know
>> of to determine if an interface is actually currently acting
>> PROMISC or not.
>>
>> Please don't 'fix' this.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
>
> The real problem is there isn't a netlink attribute that encodes
> the real flags (there should be), and when device changes state a notification
> should be sent.
Ok, that sounds great to me...but plz don't remove the work-around
in sysfs in the meantime :)
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists