[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364863243.3557.136.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 01:40:43 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <c.aeschlimann@...-group.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix IXP4xx coherent allocations
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 22:17 +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> writes:
>
> > Right, so, the answer is - yes you are talking about platform devices,
> > and the reason that these aren't already set is because if you grep for
> > ixp4xx_eth or ixp4xx_hss in arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx, you'll notice that
> > _none_ of the device declarations set either of the DMA masks at all.
> > They don't even set the dev->dma_mask pointer. That is why the masks
> > are zero. For a device which does DMA, that is wrong.
>
> Well, that's new to me. Please tell me how it should be done.
> Should I simply add in platform code (on all platforms):
>
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/XXX.c
> @@ -380,10 +380,12 @@ static struct platform_device device_eth_tab[] = {
> .name = "ixp4xx_eth",
> .id = IXP4XX_ETH_NPEB,
> .dev.platform_data = eth_plat,
> + .dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
> }, {
> .name = "ixp4xx_eth",
> .id = IXP4XX_ETH_NPEC,
> .dev.platform_data = eth_plat + 1,
> + .dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
> }
> };
>
> This alone isn't going to work, the problem is coherent DMA mask in
> net_dev->dev and not in platform_device. So what do I do in the network
> drivers? Copy the masks from platform_device to the actual newly created
> net_dev->dev?
>
> Should I use the parent device (net_dev->dev.parent which is the
> platform_device) as the argument to the allocator? This would probably
> work though I'm not sure of its correctness.
[...]
Passing the parent device to DMA API functions seems to be the right
thing to do. It's what you would do in a PCI device driver.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists