[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130403150809.GC3401@unicorn.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:08:09 +0200
From: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
isdn@...ux-pingi.de,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [Suggestion] ISDN: isdnloop: C grammar issue, '}' miss match
'if' and 'switch' statement.
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:31:17AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 16:08 +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
>
> > As far as I can see, this rather comes from
> >
> > commit 475be4d85a274d0961593db41cf85689db1d583c
> > Author: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > Date: Sun Feb 19 19:52:38 2012 -0800
> >
> > isdn: whitespace coding style cleanup
>
> And what is the problem exactly ?
>
> # make drivers/isdn/isdnloop/isdnloop.o
> ...
> CC [M] drivers/isdn/isdnloop/isdnloop.o
>
> No error here.
I just checked that gcc (surprisingly - at least for me) accepts
switch(a) {
case 1:
if(...) {
do_something();
break;
case 2:
...
break;
default:
...
break;
}
}
and it seems to work the same as
switch(a) {
case 1:
if(...) {
do_something();
}
break;
case 2:
...
break;
default:
...
break;
}
However, I can't think of a reason to use the former.
Michal Kubecek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists