| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1365250670-14993-28-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 14:17:26 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 27/51] ipvs: convert wrr scheduler to rcu
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
The schedule method now needs _rcu list-traversal
primitive for svc->destinations. As the weight for some
dest can be reduced during dest selection, change the
algorithm to check weights by using minimum weights in the
1 .. max_weight-(di-1) range, with the same step (di). By this
way we ensure that there will be always a weight >= 1 check
before claiming that all destinations are overloaded.
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wrr.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wrr.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wrr.c
index 231be7d..98cb05e 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wrr.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_wrr.c
@@ -29,14 +29,45 @@
#include <net/ip_vs.h>
+/* The WRR algorithm depends on some caclulations:
+ * - mw: maximum weight
+ * - di: weight step, greatest common divisor from all weights
+ * - cw: current required weight
+ * As result, all weights are in the [di..mw] range with a step=di.
+ *
+ * First, we start with cw = mw and select dests with weight >= cw.
+ * Then cw is reduced with di and all dests are checked again.
+ * Last pass should be with cw = di. We have mw/di passes in total:
+ *
+ * pass 1: cw = max weight
+ * pass 2: cw = max weight - di
+ * pass 3: cw = max weight - 2 * di
+ * ...
+ * last pass: cw = di
+ *
+ * Weights are supposed to be >= di but we run in parallel with
+ * weight changes, it is possible some dest weight to be reduced
+ * below di, bad if it is the only available dest.
+ *
+ * So, we modify how mw is calculated, now it is reduced with (di - 1),
+ * so that last cw is 1 to catch such dests with weight below di:
+ * pass 1: cw = max weight - (di - 1)
+ * pass 2: cw = max weight - di - (di - 1)
+ * pass 3: cw = max weight - 2 * di - (di - 1)
+ * ...
+ * last pass: cw = 1
+ *
+ */
+
/*
* current destination pointer for weighted round-robin scheduling
*/
struct ip_vs_wrr_mark {
- struct list_head *cl; /* current list head */
+ struct ip_vs_dest *cl; /* current dest or head */
int cw; /* current weight */
int mw; /* maximum weight */
int di; /* decreasing interval */
+ struct rcu_head rcu_head;
};
@@ -88,10 +119,10 @@ static int ip_vs_wrr_init_svc(struct ip_vs_service *svc)
if (mark == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
- mark->cl = &svc->destinations;
- mark->cw = 0;
- mark->mw = ip_vs_wrr_max_weight(svc);
+ mark->cl = list_entry(&svc->destinations, struct ip_vs_dest, n_list);
mark->di = ip_vs_wrr_gcd_weight(svc);
+ mark->mw = ip_vs_wrr_max_weight(svc) - (mark->di - 1);
+ mark->cw = mark->mw;
svc->sched_data = mark;
return 0;
@@ -100,24 +131,31 @@ static int ip_vs_wrr_init_svc(struct ip_vs_service *svc)
static int ip_vs_wrr_done_svc(struct ip_vs_service *svc)
{
+ struct ip_vs_wrr_mark *mark = svc->sched_data;
+
/*
* Release the mark variable
*/
- kfree(svc->sched_data);
+ kfree_rcu(mark, rcu_head);
return 0;
}
-static int ip_vs_wrr_update_svc(struct ip_vs_service *svc)
+static int ip_vs_wrr_dest_changed(struct ip_vs_service *svc,
+ struct ip_vs_dest *dest)
{
struct ip_vs_wrr_mark *mark = svc->sched_data;
- mark->cl = &svc->destinations;
- mark->mw = ip_vs_wrr_max_weight(svc);
+ write_lock_bh(&svc->sched_lock);
+ mark->cl = list_entry(&svc->destinations, struct ip_vs_dest, n_list);
mark->di = ip_vs_wrr_gcd_weight(svc);
- if (mark->cw > mark->mw)
- mark->cw = 0;
+ mark->mw = ip_vs_wrr_max_weight(svc) - (mark->di - 1);
+ if (mark->cw > mark->mw || !mark->cw)
+ mark->cw = mark->mw;
+ else if (mark->di > 1)
+ mark->cw = (mark->cw / mark->di) * mark->di + 1;
+ write_unlock_bh(&svc->sched_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -128,80 +166,79 @@ static int ip_vs_wrr_update_svc(struct ip_vs_service *svc)
static struct ip_vs_dest *
ip_vs_wrr_schedule(struct ip_vs_service *svc, const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- struct ip_vs_dest *dest;
+ struct ip_vs_dest *dest, *last, *stop = NULL;
struct ip_vs_wrr_mark *mark = svc->sched_data;
- struct list_head *p;
+ bool last_pass = false, restarted = false;
IP_VS_DBG(6, "%s(): Scheduling...\n", __func__);
- /*
- * This loop will always terminate, because mark->cw in (0, max_weight]
- * and at least one server has its weight equal to max_weight.
- */
write_lock(&svc->sched_lock);
- p = mark->cl;
+ dest = mark->cl;
+ /* No available dests? */
+ if (mark->mw == 0)
+ goto err_noavail;
+ last = dest;
+ /* Stop only after all dests were checked for weight >= 1 (last pass) */
while (1) {
- if (mark->cl == &svc->destinations) {
- /* it is at the head of the destination list */
-
- if (mark->cl == mark->cl->next) {
- /* no dest entry */
- ip_vs_scheduler_err(svc,
- "no destination available: "
- "no destinations present");
- dest = NULL;
- goto out;
- }
-
- mark->cl = svc->destinations.next;
- mark->cw -= mark->di;
- if (mark->cw <= 0) {
- mark->cw = mark->mw;
- /*
- * Still zero, which means no available servers.
- */
- if (mark->cw == 0) {
- mark->cl = &svc->destinations;
- ip_vs_scheduler_err(svc,
- "no destination available");
- dest = NULL;
- goto out;
- }
- }
- } else
- mark->cl = mark->cl->next;
-
- if (mark->cl != &svc->destinations) {
- /* not at the head of the list */
- dest = list_entry(mark->cl, struct ip_vs_dest, n_list);
+ list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(dest,
+ &svc->destinations,
+ n_list) {
if (!(dest->flags & IP_VS_DEST_F_OVERLOAD) &&
- atomic_read(&dest->weight) >= mark->cw) {
- /* got it */
- break;
- }
+ atomic_read(&dest->weight) >= mark->cw)
+ goto found;
+ if (dest == stop)
+ goto err_over;
}
-
- if (mark->cl == p && mark->cw == mark->di) {
- /* back to the start, and no dest is found.
- It is only possible when all dests are OVERLOADED */
- dest = NULL;
- ip_vs_scheduler_err(svc,
- "no destination available: "
- "all destinations are overloaded");
- goto out;
+ mark->cw -= mark->di;
+ if (mark->cw <= 0) {
+ mark->cw = mark->mw;
+ /* Stop if we tried last pass from first dest:
+ * 1. last_pass: we started checks when cw > di but
+ * then all dests were checked for w >= 1
+ * 2. last was head: the first and only traversal
+ * was for weight >= 1, for all dests.
+ */
+ if (last_pass ||
+ &last->n_list == &svc->destinations)
+ goto err_over;
+ restarted = true;
+ }
+ last_pass = mark->cw <= mark->di;
+ if (last_pass && restarted &&
+ &last->n_list != &svc->destinations) {
+ /* First traversal was for w >= 1 but only
+ * for dests after 'last', now do the same
+ * for all dests up to 'last'.
+ */
+ stop = last;
}
}
+found:
IP_VS_DBG_BUF(6, "WRR: server %s:%u "
"activeconns %d refcnt %d weight %d\n",
IP_VS_DBG_ADDR(svc->af, &dest->addr), ntohs(dest->port),
atomic_read(&dest->activeconns),
atomic_read(&dest->refcnt),
atomic_read(&dest->weight));
+ mark->cl = dest;
out:
write_unlock(&svc->sched_lock);
return dest;
+
+err_noavail:
+ mark->cl = dest;
+ dest = NULL;
+ ip_vs_scheduler_err(svc, "no destination available");
+ goto out;
+
+err_over:
+ mark->cl = dest;
+ dest = NULL;
+ ip_vs_scheduler_err(svc, "no destination available: "
+ "all destinations are overloaded");
+ goto out;
}
@@ -212,7 +249,9 @@ static struct ip_vs_scheduler ip_vs_wrr_scheduler = {
.n_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(ip_vs_wrr_scheduler.n_list),
.init_service = ip_vs_wrr_init_svc,
.done_service = ip_vs_wrr_done_svc,
- .update_service = ip_vs_wrr_update_svc,
+ .add_dest = ip_vs_wrr_dest_changed,
+ .del_dest = ip_vs_wrr_dest_changed,
+ .upd_dest = ip_vs_wrr_dest_changed,
.schedule = ip_vs_wrr_schedule,
};
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists