[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1365443267.3887.28.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:47:47 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mvadkert@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK
packet
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 13:40 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> Sort of a similar problem, but not really the same. Also, arguably, there is
> no real associated sock/socket for a RST so orphaning the packet makes sense.
> In the case of a SYNACK we can, and should, associate the packet with a
> sock/socket.
What is the intent ?
This kind of requirement has a huge cost, and thats why I want a hook
instead of a 'generic thing'
Please read :
http://workshop.netfilter.org/2013/wiki/images/3/3a/NFWS-TCP.pdf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists