netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1365520026.3887.139.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:07:06 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Cc:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	mvadkert@...hat.com, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK
 packet

On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 10:52 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:

> 
> Perhaps I'm misunderstanding, but these comments above only apply if we were 
> to increase the size of the sk_buff struct, yes?  What I proposed, replacing 
> "secmark" with a blob, does not currently change the size of the sk_buff 
> struct so the performance and memory usage should remain unchanged as well.
> 

If blob size is 4 bytes, thats fine.

If not, read again my mail.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html