netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130409.130910.1785959090953646981.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:09:10 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	pmoore@...hat.com
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, casey@...aufler-ca.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, mvadkert@...hat.com, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK
 packet

From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:00:06 -0400

> On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:56:35 PM David Miller wrote:
>> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:32:56 -0700
>> 
>> > It looks like _I_ have to do your work. Sorry, I have no more time to
>> > spend on this topic. You'll have to convince David, not me.
>> 
>> I already have no interest in considering these changes seriously,
>> and I've already asked Paul multiple times to drop this idea.
> 
> If we address all of your technical concerns, why are you not interested in 
> allowing a security blob in the sk_buff?

If you have a patch that removes space, rather than adds space, to sk_buff,
then we can talk.

Otherwise, please don't waste our time, because I'm not adding anything to
sk_buff for LSM's sake.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html