netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH ipsec] xfrm: use the right dev to fill xdst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130409124735.GA21448@secunet.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 14:47:35 +0200
From:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:	Daniel Baluta <dbaluta@...acom.com>
Cc:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ipsec] xfrm: use the right dev to fill xdst

On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 03:59:59PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Steffen Klassert
> <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:12:42PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> >> Commit bc8e4b954e46 (xfrm6: ensure to use the same dev when building a bundle)
> >> broke IPsec for IPv4 over IPv6 tunnels (because dev points to an IPv4 only
> >> interface, hence in6_dev_get(dev) returns NULL.
> >
> > Can you give some informations on how to reproduce this? I'm running
> > interfamily tunnels on our testing environment and it seems to
> > work fine.
> 
> I can hit this in our setup while using some internal custom simulated
> interfaces.
> 
> Anyhow, this should be reproducible with a classic IPv6 IPsec over
> IPv4 test.  Please make sure
> that the IPv4 interface doesn't have an IPv6 address set up.
> 
> Quoting from commit bc8e4b954e46 (xfrm6: ensure to use the same dev
> when building a bundle):
> 
> -       xdst->u.rt6.rt6i_idev = in6_dev_get(rt->u.dst.dev);
> +       xdst->u.rt6.rt6i_idev = in6_dev_get(dev);
> 
> dev points to IPv4 endpoint and if it doesn't have an IPv6 address
> associated then
> in6_dev_get(dev) will return NULL.

Hm, inet6_init() registers addrconf_notify() as a netdevice notifier
function. So addrconf_notify() is called whenever a netdevice is
registered. When looking at addrconf_notify(), there are only two
cases when the net_device has no inet6_dev assigned. This is either
on error, or if the device mtu is smaller than IPV6_MIN_MTU (i.e. 1280).

I can reproduce the behaviour you describe if I set the mtu of the
ipv4 device to a value below IPV6_MIN_MTU, but in no other case.

Is it possible that your ipv4 device has a mtu below IPV6_MIN_MTU?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html