[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7761183.G42DetJs5Z@linux-5eaq.site>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:10:11 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Elina Pasheva <epasheva@...rrawireless.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Rory Filer <rfiler@...rrawireless.com>,
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v4] usbnet: allow status interrupt URB to always be active
On Wednesday 10 April 2013 10:01:20 Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 15:58 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 April 2013 08:54:43 Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > The refcounting is very good. Just don't mess around with "force"
> > >
> > > That's easy to do if the helpers aren't used for suspend/resume, which
> > > is what I had previously in my v2 patches until Ming suggested that I
> > > use the helpers there. I can go back to that approach if you'd like, it
> > > is a bit less complicated at the expense of sprinkling the interrupt urb
> > > submit/kill code around more widely.
> >
> > If you introduce a third helper like "forcibly_stop_interrupt" or something,
> > I'll be perfectly happy. Just don't use flags which completely alter behavior.
> >
> > Regards
> > Oliver
>
> Do you mean something more like this? If so, I'll go ahead and do the
> formal submission. Thanks!
That looks good and ready.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists