netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/3] if.h: add IFF_BRIDGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130410134609.46bcaeae@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date:	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:46:09 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...n-mesh.com>
Cc:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
	<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] if.h: add IFF_BRIDGE_RESTRICTED flag

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:54:34 +0200
Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...n-mesh.com> wrote:

> Hi Jamal, all,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 08:49:17 -0700, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > On 13-04-09 09:51 AM, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > > Does this work at the bridge level? A packet entering a port and going out from
> > > another one can be affected by tc/mark?
> > 
> > Yes of course. And on any construct that looks like a netdev (tunnels etc).
> > 
> 
> Thanks for your hints. After having struggled a bit I found out how to do it
> using ebtables and the mark target :)
> 
> Thanks a Lot!
> 
> These patches seem to be useless now
> 
> Cheers,
> 

Come back again, though. The ebtables method offers more flexibility which can
be a good or bad thing...

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)