[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51660BEC.1080901@asianux.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:03:40 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
CC: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: audit: beautify code, for extern function, better
to check its parameters by itself
On 2013年04月11日 01:31, Eric Paris wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> >
>> > __audit_socketcall is an extern function.
>> > better to check its parameters by itself.
>> >
>> > also can return error code, when fail (find invalid parameters).
>> > also use macro instead of real hard code number
>> > also give related comments for it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
>> > ---
>> > include/linux/audit.h | 12 ++++++++----
>> > kernel/auditsc.c | 9 ++++++---
>> > net/socket.c | 6 ++++--
>> > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
>> > @@ -354,7 +358,7 @@ static inline int audit_bprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>> > {
>> > return 0;
>> > }
>> > -static inline void audit_socketcall(int nargs, unsigned long *args)
>> > +static inline int audit_socketcall(int nargs, unsigned long *args)
>> > { }
>> > static inline void audit_fd_pair(int fd1, int fd2)
>> > { }
> This now returns a value but you forgot to return a value. Thus this would not even build... I fixed it up myself.
thank you very much.
:-)
--
Chen Gang
Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists