[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVPPzva+EwjNdxWsg4FufCc0zzzzvhGH_nLv479vT8VcxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:59:05 +0800
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
Elina Pasheva <epasheva@...rrawireless.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Rory Filer <rfiler@...rrawireless.com>,
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v5] usbnet: allow status interrupt URB to always be active
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 11 April 2013 20:11:13 Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Sorry, I misunderstood.
>>
>> No problem, :-)
>>
>> >
>> > Task A Task B queue
>> >
>> > queue work
>> > request a reset
>> > allocate memory and block
>> > cancel the work
>> > shit happened
>>
>> If I understand the case correctly, the above deadlock can be avoided
>> by canceling rx/tx URBs at the end of pre_reset() or usbnet_disconnect(),
>
> No. cancel_work_sync() must wait for the work. The work will not finish.
The work will complete when memory is reclaimed, and the rx/tx path is
still working, so memory reclaim can continue and the deadlock may not
be caused, may it?
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists