netdev - Re: [PATCH] iproute2: lib/utils.c bug fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130412203621.GB23992@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date:	Fri, 12 Apr 2013 22:36:21 +0200
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	Mr Dash Four <mr.dash.four@...glemail.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iproute2: lib/utils.c bug fixes

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:36:38PM +0100, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> >Please don't play a cat and mouse game with the folks around here. Is your
> >submission signed off with your *real* name?
> *Yes* - I thought that was pretty obvious.
> 
> Stephen determined that for whatever reason the name appearing in the 
> Signed-By tag "is a bit strange", so it must either be made up or a 
> pseudonym and I took issue with this.
> 
> > This is a simple requirement for patch submissions.
> Which is fair enough, I suppose.
> 
> >Why do you let the people reviewing and perhaps committing
> >your patch guess? Just clarify it in one sentence.
> I am not sure I understand that question, but my patch submission is 
> simply to correct 3 bugs in the current iproute2 tree - there is no 
> other (ulterior) motive behind it. I am letting people reviewing (or 
> committing) that patch as they are the (current/rightful) maintainers of 
> this project (iproute2). This (the reason for issuing the patch and the 
> subsequent request to review it) was made, I think pretty clear, in the 
> patch submission heading.

These were rhetoric questions. After your (in my opionion harsh) answer to
Stephen I had doubts, too. Especially your first argument to Stephen's
mail (that you already submitted changes with this signature) was void (or
should have been the second or third argument). IMHO this inflamed the
situation.

> >If it is not your real name it does violate the policy. It is that simple.
> >  
> I was perfectly aware of that before making that submission - as I 
> already pointed out in one of my previous posts, this isn't my first 
> submission (in the kernel tree as well as in other open-source projects) 
> and I hope it won't be the last.

I hope so. ;)

I think I clarified up my mail and will leave this discussion now, too.

Thanks,

  Hannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html