netdev - Re: [net-next 02/11] ixgbe: Mask off check of frag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1365801125.4459.73.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:12:05 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Cc:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 02/11] ixgbe: Mask off check of frag_off as we only
 want fragment offset

On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 14:05 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:

>  The problem right now is if I call __skb_get_poff it will go
> through the portion of that path you didn't call out that does
> skb_copy_bits.

Absolutely not : skb->data_len is 0.

How possibly can you say such things ?

OK I give up with this topic.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html