[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87txncawez.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:13:56 +0200
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>, Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
Elina Pasheva <epasheva@...rrawireless.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Rory Filer <rfiler@...rrawireless.com>,
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v5] usbnet: allow status interrupt URB to always be active
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org> writes:
> On Friday 12 April 2013 17:42:46 Ming Lei wrote:
>
>> Wrt. the usbnet_status_start() API, looks no good reason to call
>> it in another queue context, it should be enough to call it in probe() or
>> bind() if init_status() can be put before info->bind() in usbnet_probe().
>
> We are talking about a generic helper. And the fix is really simple.
> We just pass mem_flags and all is well. If the API can be made better
> at next to no cost, we do it.
I absolutely agree with this.
>> Then looks the mem_flags isn't needed in both cases, and we should
>> always take GFP_NOIO inside the API?
>
> We cannot. GFP_ATOMIC may be needed. And no, we atre not going to
> unconditionally use GFP_ATOMIC :-;
But I don't think we ever will need GFP_ATOMIC as long as we take a
mutex lock anyway.
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists