[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1365773465.4459.21.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 06:31:05 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/11] ixgbe: Support using build_skb in the case
that jumbo frames are disabled
On Fri, 2013-04-12 at 06:10 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Strange. I feel you overestimate the final skb->truesize
>
> The name 'truesize' is a bit misleading here, as its the size of
> skb->head. A better name would have been frag_size, and you should not
> include in it the struct skb_shared_info overhead because build_skb()
> does it :
>
Oh well, build_skb() does :
size -= SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
so your patch is fine, only the @truesize name is misleading.
> skb->truesize will be set to SKB_TRUESIZE(frag_size)
>
> #define SKB_TRUESIZE(X) ((X) + \
> SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct sk_buff)) + \
> SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)))
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists