[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5168B316.8010801@collabora.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 03:21:26 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@...com>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] genirq: add function to get IRQ edge/level flags
On 04/12/2013 11:56 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 12:05 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> ...
>> So, is better to add an irq_get_trigger_type() function to obtain
>> the edge/level flags for an IRQ.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
>
>> +static inline u32 irq_get_trigger_type(unsigned int irq)
>> +{
>> + struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>> + return d ? d->state_use_accessors & IRQD_TRIGGER_MASK : 0;
>
> Should the direct access to d->state_use_accessors be replaced with a
> call to irqd_get_trigger_type()? Perhaps since this is inside the IRQ
> code header, there's no need to use the accessor function?
>
Yes, it's better to use irqd_get_trigger_type() instead of a direct access to
d->state_use_accessors since that function is inline so it should be the same
performance wise and it will be easier to maintain.
I'll send a v2 changing that.
Thanks a lot and best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists