[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1365858859.4459.94.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 06:14:19 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tcp: tcp_tso_segment() small optimization
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
We can more th->check computation out of the loop, as compiler
doesn't know each skb initially share same tcp headers after
skb_segment()
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 963bda1..dcb116d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2886,6 +2886,7 @@ struct sk_buff *tcp_tso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
unsigned int oldlen;
unsigned int mss;
struct sk_buff *gso_skb = skb;
+ __sum16 newcheck;
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(*th)))
goto out;
@@ -2936,11 +2937,13 @@ struct sk_buff *tcp_tso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
th = tcp_hdr(skb);
seq = ntohl(th->seq);
+ newcheck = ~csum_fold((__force __wsum)((__force u32)th->check +
+ (__force u32)delta));
+
do {
th->fin = th->psh = 0;
+ th->check = newcheck;
- th->check = ~csum_fold((__force __wsum)((__force u32)th->check +
- (__force u32)delta));
if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)
th->check =
csum_fold(csum_partial(skb_transport_header(skb),
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists