netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: fec: Enable imx6 enet checksum acceleration.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130416.140032.376392714783850324.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:00:32 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jim_baxter@...tor.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: fec: Enable imx6 enet checksum
 acceleration.

From: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:09:25 +0000 (UTC)

> David Miller <davem <at> davemloft.net> writes:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> When you post multiple versions of a patch, always say what is different
>> between the versions.
>> 
> 
> 
> Sorry, I was trying to differentiate between my first two messed up posts and 
> the correct patch post. I first forgot to mark it net-net and then I managed 
> to send it from y@...ay1.mentorg.com.
> 
> Is there a better way to correct incorrect patch headers?

You post it again, but you say what you changed so that we know what
is happening.

You put such change annotations after the "---" seperator so that they
do not appear in the final commit message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html