[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <516E6538.8060804@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:02:48 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
CC: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/cpsw: don't disable_irqs() after an interrupt has
been received.
On 04/17/2013 10:46 AM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> On 4/17/2013 1:14 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> I have tested this patch and it hangs the CPU after net open (CPSW
>>> init).
>> If I remove additionally the napi_schedule() piece then the network is
>> dead (as expected) and the system continues to work (and I receive
>> interrupts) and the ISR for cpsw is not executed again. What hardware /
>> CPU do you have?
>>
> I am testing on Beagle Bone black.
I have here vanila v3.8.4 + cpsw patches which were in net-next. As for
the hardware:
[ 0.000000] Machine: Generic AM33XX (Flattened Device Tree), model:
TI AM335x BeagleBone
[ 0.000000] AM335X ES1.0 (neon )
model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l)
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x3
CPU part : 0xc08
CPU revision : 2
If we do have the same hardware and source why do I have different
behavior? Can you send me your .config off-list?
> Regards
> Mugunthan V N
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists