netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net: fec: Enable imx6 enet checksum acceleration.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51702B9A.8070000@mentor.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:21:30 +0100
From:	Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Frank Li <Frank.Li@...escale.com>,
	Fugang Duan <B38611@...escale.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/1] net: fec: Enable imx6 enet checksum acceleration.

On 18/04/13 18:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:08 +0100, Jim Baxter wrote:
>> On 18/04/13 17:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 13:49 +0100, Jim Baxter wrote:
>>>> On 17/04/13 22:37, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 21:07 +0100, Jim Baxter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +			skb_set_transport_header(skb,
>>>>>> +					ETH_HLEN + ip_hdrlen(skb));
>>>>>> +			udp_hdr(skb)->check = 0;
>>>>>> +			break;
>>>>>> +		case IPPROTO_TCP:
>>>>>> +			hdr_len = (ETH_HLEN +
>>>>>> +					(ip_hdr(skb)->ihl << 2) +
>>>>>> +					sizeof(struct tcphdr));
>>>>>> +			if (skb->len < hdr_len)
>>>>>> +				return;
>>>>>> +			skb_cow_head(skb, hdr_len);
>>>>>
>>>>> same here
>>>> Do I need to call skb_cow_head here, I am not changing the size of the
>>>> header?
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> The length passed to skb_cow_head() may be significant when the skb has
>>> paged fragments.  Since you aren't (yet) implementing scatter-gather,
>>> that won't happen.  And the headers shouldn't be in paged fragments
>>> anyway.  I think you can safely use skb_cow_head(skb, 0).
>>>
>>> But you don't actually need to check protocol numbers at all, as the
>>> kernel already specifies where the checksum should be.
>>>
>>> So I think this function should look like:
>>> {
>>> 	if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)
>>> 		return 0;
>>>
>>> 	if (unlikely(skb_cow_head(skb, 0)))
>>> 		return -1;
>>>
>>> 	*(__sum16 *)(skb->head + skb->csum_start + skb->csum_offset) = 0;
>>> 	return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> The caller needs to check for the failure, and free the skb
>>> (kfree_skb()) rather than transmitting it.
>>>
>>> Ben.
>>>
>>
>> Which checksum does skb->csum (skb->csum_start + skb->csum_offset)
>> relate to?
> 
> TCP or UDP.
> 
>> The network card can generate IP header and protocol (UDP/TCP/ICMP)
>> checksums as long as the checksums are zeroed?
> 
> You don't need to offload the IPv4 header checksum.  TX checksum offload
> will not be requested for ICMP.

So the kernel only offloads TCP and UDP checksum's. All other transport
protocols (ICMP, ICMPIPV6 etc.) will be done by the kernel.

> 
> Ben.
> 

Thanks, though I saw you replied to my question before I could send it.

It sounds like there is no reason wasting CPU cycles clearing the IP
header checksum, so I can keep the code efficient.

Jim

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html